EmptyHighway
I haven't figured it out either.

October 29, 2003

Freecycling

Freecycling--something to think about it, because you still can't take it with you. A little revolutionary fun that could possibly put Wal-Mart out of business...who is game?

`Freecycling' Devotees Are Saving the World, One Item at a Time

BY MARGIE BOULE
c.2003 Newhouse News Service


Imagine being able to get free stuff, reform your inner pack rat, help someone in need, protect the environment and perhaps even participate in a revolution.

Sound radical? Not if you take it one free thing at a time.

That's the concept of "freecycling."

For more information go to the extended entry...

`Freecycling' Devotees Are Saving the World, One Item at a Time

BY MARGIE BOULE
c.2003 Newhouse News Service


Imagine being able to get free stuff, reform your inner pack rat, help someone in need, protect the environment and perhaps even participate in a revolution.

Sound radical? Not if you take it one free thing at a time.

That's the concept of "freecycling."

Freecycling, says its Arizona creator, Deron Beal, is "a strange creature. It's basically a listserv for people to give and get things locally for free." A listserv is a computer program that automatically distributes e-mail to everybody who signed up on a mailing list.

Freecycling works like this: You have, say, a radial arm saw sitting in your basement that you bought, thinking you'd take a carpentry class and make a dining room table. Ten years later you're still eating on a card table and realize you'll never fire up that saw.

So you send an e-mail to a local Freecycle listserv titled: "OFFERED: RADIAL ARM SAW." Sure enough, within a day or so you get an e-mail from somebody who could really use that saw. They come pick it up, and you're free to pick a new hobby.

While you're trying to decide, you might peruse the free items others have posted on the Freecycle list: Do you need a small refrigerator? A queen-size mattress? An oil tank?

Or you could request specific items you're looking for, say, bricks, a bread machine, door gates for a puppy, or a time clock.

Depending on whom you talk to, freecycling is either a handy way to clear your closets or a planet-changing economic system similar to the Native American gift-giving ceremony "potlatch."

"I see freecycle as a way not only to keep our landfills free," says devotee Albert Kaufman, "but to allow people to experience a gift-giving economy." Kaufman runs a listserv in Portland, Ore.

Freecycling is spreading fast around the planet. Just last week Freecycle listservs were begun in Tokyo and Singapore.

It all started in Tucson, Ariz., in May. Beal, who's 36, runs a small nonprofit recycling organization in Tucson. Every once in a while someone would donate a desk, or computers, "and I'd have to call all these nonprofits, asking, `Do you need a computer? We have a computer. Do you need desks?' It was a lot of work."

One day it occurred to Beal: He could start a listserv, post what was available, and save himself all those phone calls. "And then I thought, why don't we open it up to everybody?"

So he did. "The first e-mail I sent to my friends and 10 or 15 nonprofits. That was on May 1. It started picking up pretty quickly."

After a week he had 30 people signed up; within a month it was up to 60. Today more than 1,100 folks in Tucson trade a steady stream of offers of, and requests for, items as diverse as propane barbecues, old wrestling videos, a prickly pear cactus and a Hammond organ.

"There's someone out there who needs almost everything," Beal said by phone.

By midsummer in Tucson, it was clear Beal had conceived an innovative way to meet those needs. Someone sent a description of freecycle in Tucson to the Utne Reader, which put a blurb on its Web site in August and a small story in its September/October issue.

"All of a sudden we got responses from all over the place," Beal says, "from people looking for guidance, saying they wanted to do this."

One of the responses was from Kaufman, 42, in Portland. A big supporter of recycling, he liked the idea of giving people a way to "freecycle" their trash, "rather than just tossing it away."

He contacted Beal, set up a Freecycle Portland listserv, and posted the first offer himself Sept. 16: a free one-hour guitar lesson. "The second posting was just a few minutes later, and it was a car," Kaufman says.

As it has in nearly every other city, Freecycling has taken off in Portland. Someone has offered to make free videos for rock bands. Someone else requested donations of large-size dresses.

Kaufman is moderator. Actually running the listserv takes only about five minutes a day, he says. He keeps out spam and ensures the most important rule is scrupulously followed: Everything must be free. No bartering. No exchanges of money.

Kaufman thinks it could change the way people look at their possessions. Beal agrees. "People go in thinking `want, want, want,"' Beal says. "But they come out feeling, `I'm helping out. I'm part of something bigger here."'

"For some people, it's a way to get a free toaster," Kaufman says. "For others of us, it's a way to change the world."

Oct. 27, 2003

(Margie Boule is a staff writer for The Oregonian of Portland, Ore. She can be contacted at marboule@aol.com.)

October 20, 2003

This entitles ...

This entitles you to a raincheck for dinner (and whatever else you desire). In the location of your choice. Sometime in the near future. For it is your birthday and you are under-the-lovely weather and I am over-the-weather because you are my northern, southern, eastern, and western winds. Rain or shine. Night or day. You move me everyday, in everyway.

I love you. Have a happy birthday! And say hi to kitty for me. Be home soon.

October 15, 2003

time to upgrade

I need to upgrade Moveable Type so I can install this; which will help me post more photos, easier. Well, ideally. We'll see.

October 14, 2003

To be and to have

I have been thinking and semi-researching becoming a teacher. Coincidentally, Tracie and I went to see this movie yesterday.

Well, perhaps not coincidentally, we've both been talking about teaching for a number of months. Tracie had picked the film and I knew nothing about it, besides that it was set in rural France and had to do with a teacher.

Tracie's deciding on whether or not she is going to go to a workshop for teaching this summer, and I am pondering whether I am cut from the right cloth to teach. Or more importantly if that is my next step in life. I am looking into the NYC Teaching Fellows. I have an email sitting in my inbox from about a month and a half ago that I need to formulate a response and send in with my application (which may in fact be too late for next summer). I am afraid of screwing some kids up, and afraid of not knowing enough to teach anyone. I'm feeling lame in other words.

I've been working at this organization for over 3 years, as an IT professional (whatever that means) and it seems it's time to have more direct daily contact with people, and people I can benefit for that matter.

The movie was poignant for me in that it reminded that I can do this, and should do this, not because it's time to move on, but it is time to make the change I seek.

Perhaps it is time to plan a little and... do, do, do?

I recommend this movie to all of you out there. If not, for the appreciation of teaching, then simply for the appreciation of life and more importantly childhood.

October 09, 2003

One of those moments...

"Hey!..It's not a performance place it's a subway!"

I almost stopped this ass and asked him why he yelled this to the woman who was singing at the bottom of the Back Bay stairway in the station this evening, but I didn't.

He was an average looking white guy, mid-fifties, grey hair, stern look, and a chip on his shoulder.

He said this in passing to the woman. Bent down as he was coming down the stairs (as if he was gonna compliment on her singing, or perhaps throw some money in her guitar case. But no, he yelled this to her. I watched as her face went from smiling to confused and irritated.

Why did you do that you ass? Why are you such an ass?

Why didn't I say something. I stopped at the bench that he sat down at, I thought about that scene in Magnolia, when Tom Cruise's character says in response to the interviewer "...I am quietly judging you...". I was also, so I left. I'd like to think that is why I didn't say anything, perhaps ultimately, it's because I'm jaded, I've seen this type of behavior from asses like this, time and again. I surely have done this to someone myself somewhere along the way.

Why is it that we feel the need to bash on people's good will, and willingness to take the chance, and risk in living a different life than we?

It's all art...

In response to...Is it Art? and this article.

Interesting indeed and timely. I've been thinking about this on and off for the last two or three years.

However, Reed's notion of Primary Wealth and Secondary wealth seem a bit of a stretch at the very least. You have to take this idea of Primary and Secondary wealth and assume it's true early on to agree with what Reed says.

While I understand these conception of production, those who create to fulfill basic needs vs. those who consume the basic needs and create accessories or human culture. I don't agree with them fully. Reed's depiction of the "Artist" as this Secondary Wealth producing entity, strikes me as half-mad.

I mean who of us do you know that lives off their "art" (the end-product)? Who would and who could? Is that what any of us are aiming to do? In all my discussions with artist friends I have not met a one, that doesn't do these very Primary Wealth producing things. I would venture to say, that most of American artists, and for that matter International artists, breath life into the fabric of our nation by doing and creating simply because they can. I don't believe that art is relegated to those who: paint, sculpt, draw, etc. This is not an oversimplification; it is a return to a clear conception of art. That is where the "art world" is.

Sure, you can look at the miniscule elitist art scene, the ones who are in fact considered "Professional Artists" and see that they have to pull out of the rest of society and let society sustain them while they do their part for humanity, and some will even defend them. And the reality is for me; go ahead defend them if you are out there, because there is a place for them, albeit, that place is getting increasingly smaller. When you look at them you see all these things, even when you look at the work you do yourself. For example the writing on this site, sustained in suspension on stolen energy, stolen, cause who's to say it is contributing to the common good of anyone.

I also think Reed oversimplifies "artists", and tries to relegate them all to this Secondary Wealth mechanism. While in fact the nut of what he is trying to get at is that, it isn't the art that is the problem, it is the disconnect from making a whole world that his conception of an artist confines themselves. This isn't just happening in the art world, it is happening all around us. It is called professionalization of society. The professional artist is by definition one who steps back from society and does her own thing? Well maybe then, but now I see that we are headed in the other direction.

I think there are a phenomenal number of artists that are more aware of their own hypocrisies, i.e. in the environmental impact of their work. Many have had realizations akin to Reed's and dropped out of art "production" entirely (check out Suzi Gablik's "Conversations before the end of time").

Fundamentally I agree with what he is implying we need to think about our impact on the world and then act to reverse it as often as possible. I think many of us are striving to get there. This is thinking holistically. Yes, we should. And some of us are trying.

October 08, 2003

MsSweeney's #11

It's out. I've had it for several weeks. I finished reading it and now I hear it comes in many colors.

The binding and design appeals to my bibliophile side.
One Version of the cover

Please get it, read it, and comment. All I can say is..."The Specialist" by Alison Smith.

October 04, 2003

Is it Art?

I recommend this article to all artists visiting this site, which, of course, includes every one of us. The article's original date is apparently 1984, funny that the American art world of today continues to be more exclusive, a professant of band-aid status quo whose products remain systemically relegated to secondary wealth orientation.

http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC05/Reed.htm

I often wonder if paintings were ever meant to travel? Changing my landscape informs my processes and subject-matter, but I remain a Texan artist.

Think of all of the promotional materials and efforts pumped out for an exceptionally noteworthy museum exhibit by our given premier institutions. Measure the levels of toxicity of inks, papers, plastics, energy expediture, transport, etc. to create a "successful" exhibition.

visitor guides
educational materials
headsets
billboards
advertising
member brochures
mailers
computer-aided internet interactivity
crating
shipping
insurance
experience-oriented status paraphenalia